E-mail this
page to a friend!
Vioxx May Have Caused 140,000 Serious Heart Attacks
Jan. 25, 2005 - The arthritis drug Vioxx could have
caused an estimated 88,000140,000 excess cases of serious coronary
heart disease in the USA since its launch in 1999, concludes a study
published online by The Lancet.
Vioxx (rofecoxib) belongs to a class of
cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitor selective nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are prescribed for the treatment
of arthritis. Vioxx was withdrawn from the pharmaceutical market at the
end of September 2004 after use of the drug was linked to heart
problems.
David J Graham (Office of Drug Safety, US Food and
Drug Administration) and colleagues assessed whether coronary heart
disease risk was increased with either high or standard doses of Vioxx
compared with other (NSAIDs) or the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib
(Celebrex), a drug commonly used as an alternative to Vioxx.
They analysed data from 1·4 million people in
California who had used NSAIDs from the beginning of 1999 to September
2004. Patients had received various NSAIDs, including celecoxib (around
40000 users), ibuprofen (just under a million users), naproxen (around
435000 users), and rofecoxib (around 27000 users). The investigators
found that 8143 individuals had serious coronary heart disease, 1508 of
which had sudden cardiac death. Each case was matched by age and sex to
four controls to enable a comparison of coronary heart disease risk
among people taking Vioxx and users of other NSAIDs.
People taking Vioxx had a 34% higher chance of
coronary heart disease when compared with people who used other NSAIDs.
Coronary heart disease was 1·6 times more likely among people currently
taking standard-dose Vioxx compared with those currently taking
celecoxib and 3·6 times more likely among high-dose users. The study
also found that people taking naproxen had a 14% increased risk of
coronary heart disease compared with other NSAIDs. Previous studies have
suggested that naproxen protects against coronary heart disease.
Dr Graham comments: An estimated 88 000-140 000
excess cases of serious coronary heart disease probably occurred in the
USA over the market life of rofecoxib. The US national estimate of the
case-fatality rate (fatal acute myocardial infarction plus sudden
cardiac death) was 44%, which suggests that many of the excess cases
attributable to rofecoxib use were fatal.
In the future, when trials show that a new
treatment confers a greater risk of a serious adverse effect than a
standard treatment, we must be much more careful about allowing its
unrestrained use.
In an accompanying commentary Simon RJ Maxwell and
David J Webb (University of Edinburgh, UK) write that after the
withdrawal of Vioxx increased attention will now focus on the
cardiovascular safety of other COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs).
Professor Webb concludes: It now falls to the
manufacturers, under the careful review of the regulatory authorities,
to provide the evidence that this class of drugs is safe, if necessary
including studies that directly address cardiovascular morbidity as a
primary outcome. Indeed, the experience with coxibs underlines the need
for full publication of all clinical trial data generated in support of
newly licensed drugs.